Using Blended and Virtual Schwartz Center Rounds® to Support Maternity Staff in Ireland During the Covid-19 Pandemic

Authors

  • Jean Doherty National Maternity Hospital, Holles Street, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2699-1629
  • Clara K Devine National Maternity Hospital, Holles Street, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland
  • Sarah Cullen National Maternity Hospital, Holles Street, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30994/jnp.v5i1.160

Keywords:

Schwartz Rounds, Staff support, Virtual support, Maternity staff, Virtual Schwartz Rounds

Abstract

Background: Many staff supports, such as the internationally accredited Schwartz Center Rounds were suspended worldwide during the Covid-19 restrictions, at a time when they were most needed. Schwartz Rounds are multi-disciplinary forums where staff can discuss the emotional, social and ethical challenges of care in a confidential and safe environment, intending to improve staff well-being and patient care. In a bid to improve staff support after the suspension of full Schwartz Rounds, virtual, then blended (limited spaces for socially distanced in-person attendance and virtual access) Rounds were initiated.
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate Schwartz Rounds in a maternity setting in Ireland and compare full-in person Rounds with virtual and blended Rounds.
Methods: Standard Schwartz Rounds evaluation forms were completed by Rounds attendees. Data were analysed using SPSS (Version 24). Respondents were invited to include a comment at the end of the form, and these free-text comments were analysed thematically.
Results: Six Rounds were evaluated (2 full in-person Rounds attended before the pandemic, 1 virtual, 3 blended) and a total of 115 evaluation forms were completed. The Rounds were rated extremely high. Some, but not all aspects of the Rounds were rated more positively from the full in-person Rounds. Some technical difficulties were a barrier to fully experiencing the Round when attending remotely.
Conclusion: Schwartz Rounds are attended by staff in over 560 healthcare organisations, internationally and have been reported to improve staff well-being and teamwork. The pandemic saw Schwartz Rounds being suspended in most organisations due to social distancing guidelines. Virtual and blended Rounds are recommended as an effective replacement for full Schwartz Rounds while social distancing and infection control measures are in place. However, in order to improve post-panellist discussion and gain the full Schwartz Round experience, recommencement of full, in-person Rounds are recommended as soon as public health measures allow

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adamson, K., Sengsavang, S., Myers-Halbig, S. and Searl, N. (2018) Developing a Compassionate Culture Within Pediatric Rehabilitation: Does the Schwartz RoundsTM Support Both Clinical and Nonclinical Hospital Workers in Managing Their Work Experiences? Qualitative Health Research, 28(9) 1406–1420.

Chadwick, R.J., Muncer, S.J., Hannon, B.C., Goodrich, J. and Cornwell, J. (2016) Support for compassionate care: Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of Schwartz Center Rounds in an acute general hospital. JRSM Open, 7(7) 205427041664804.

Cullen, S. (2021) Implementing Schwartz Rounds in an Irish maternity hospital. Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 190(1) 205–208.

Doherty, J. and O’Brien, D. (2021) A participatory action research study exploring midwives’ understandings of the concept of burnout in Ireland. Women and Birth, S1871519221001037.

Flanagan, E., Chadwick, R., Goodrich, J., Ford, C. and Wickens, R. (2020) Reflection for all healthcare staff: A national evaluation of Schwartz Rounds. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 34(1) 140–142.

Gleeson, D., Arwyn-Jones, J., Awan, M., White, I. and Halse, O. (2020) Medical Student Schwartz Rounds: A Powerful Medium for Medical Student Reflective Practice. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, Volume 11 775–780.

Hayes, B., Walsh, G. and Prihodova, L. (2017) NATIONAL STUDY OF WELLBEING OF HOSPITAL DOCTORS IN IRELAND. 1. Dublin: Royal College of Physicians in Ireland.

Hunter, B., Henley, J., Fenwick, J., Sidebotham, Mary and Pallant, J. (2018) Work, Health and Emotional Lives of Midwives in the United Kingdom: The UK WHELM study.

Jakimowicz, S. and Maben, J. (2020) ‘I can’t stop thinking about it’: Schwartz Rounds ® an intervention to support students and higher education staff with emotional, social and ethical experiences at work. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(23–24) 4421–4424.

Lamothe, M., Boujut, E., Zenasni, F. and Sultan, S. (2014) To be or not to be empathic: the combined role of empathic concern and perspective taking in understanding burnout in general practice. BMC Family Practice, 15(1) 15.

Maben, J., Taylor, C., Dawson, J., Leamy, M., McCarthy, I., Reynolds, E., Ross, S., Shuldham, C., Bennett, L. and Foot, C. (2018) A realist informed mixed-methods evaluation of Schwartz Center Rounds® in England. Health Services and Delivery Research, 6(37) 1–260.

Maslach, C. and Leiter, M.P. (2008) Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3) 498–512.

Mboua, C.P., Keubo, F.R.N. and Fouaka, S.G.N. (2021) Anxiété et dépression associées à la prise en charge de la COVID-19 chez les personnels de santé au Cameroun (Anxiety and Depression Associated with the Management of Covid-19 Among Healthcare Workers in Cameroon). L’Évolution Psychiatrique, 86(1) 131–139.

Munro, A.J. and Swartzman, S. (2013) What is a virtual multidisciplinary team (vMDT)? British Journal of Cancer, 108(12) 2433–2441.

Reeves, S., Pelone, F., Harrison, R., Goldman, J. and Zwarenstein, M. (2017) Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (ed.). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2018(8). Available from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3 [accessed 21 July 2021].

Schaufeli, W.B., Leiter, M.P. and Maslach, C. (2009) Burnout: 35 years of research and practice. 32.

Schulze, J. and Krumm, S. (2017) The ‘virtual team player’: A review and initial model of knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics for virtual collaboration. Organizational Psychology Review, 7(1) 66–95.

Silke, A., Rushe, H., Keating, R. and Barrett, E. (2019) Caring for Caregivers: An evaluation of Schwartz Rounds in a paediatric setting. Irish Medical Journal, 112(6) 951.

Taylor, C., Xyrichis, A., Leamy, M.C., Reynolds, E. and Maben, J. (2018) Can Schwartz Center Rounds support healthcare staff with emotional challenges at work, and how do they compare with other interventions aimed at providing similar support? A systematic review and scoping reviews. BMJ Open, 8(10) e024254.

Welp, A., Meier, L.L. and Manser, T. (2016) The interplay between teamwork, clinicians’ emotional exhaustion, and clinician-rated patient safety: a longitudinal study. Critical Care, 20(1) 110.

Published

2021-10-01

How to Cite

Doherty, J., Devine, C. K., & Cullen, S. (2021). Using Blended and Virtual Schwartz Center Rounds® to Support Maternity Staff in Ireland During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal Of Nursing Practice, 5(1), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.30994/jnp.v5i1.160